Skip to main content

Broken English (2007)

Broken English. Feature film. (2007, 97 mins) IMDB

...if only they got the third act right...

T

he title for this film, BROKEN ENGLISH, comes, I guess, from the fact our hero's love interest is French and English is his second language. I know many Europeans for whom English is a second language and they speak it as well as anyone in North America or Britain. It all depends on when and where they learnt the language. It's a cliché to have a foreigner speak with "broken English" but so be it.

Our hero in the film is Nora Wilder played by Parker Posey--the so called "Queen of the indies." This film is definitely an indie. It doesn't follow the Hollywood standards for romantic comedies.

There is romance and love and lost love and angst in this film, but I didn't see a great deal of comedy. Supposedly it's there, but I didn't see. Not even satirical moments. That's not a complaint, just my observation.

The fact the film doesn't follow Hollywood standards and norms for romantic comedies, means the film isn't, for the most part, predictable, but it also lacks what we enjoy in those types of film--we enjoy fantasy. Most of us are so bewildered and disappointed with life, we want our spirits lifted by a movie that lies to us about true love and romance. We're suckers for it. This film is not one of those films.

One of the challenges, of many, a writer must overcome in writing any story, is naming the characters. It seems like a simple task, but it is quite difficult. You can't use Jack Kennedy or Lee Oswald or Al Capone and so on and so on. John Brown and John Smith are bland. Martha and Edith don't cut it either. Samantha isn't the same as Elizabeth which is different from Sarah. Or is that Sara? See. Naming characters is quite difficult.

Our screenwriter follows an unusual choice. See if you can catch it. NORA WILDER. NICK GABLE. CHARLIE ROSE. PETER ANDREWS. IRVING. AUDREY. VIVIEN. JENNIFER ROSS. Sorry, the last one is a friend of mine. There are probably others, but I've never seen such choices before.

I'm not sure why she chose these names, they all bring to mind connotations that aren't necessarily appropriate for this film. NICK and NORA (CHARLES) comes from THE THIN MAN movies of the 1930s and 40s starring William Powell and Myrna Loy. That couple is fun, amusing, amicable and in love. In this film, Nick is a cad who uses Nora for a one night stand. Not quite the same. Oops.

Is it possible the filmmakers are referring back to those old B&W films as a statement about love today? No for the simple reason 9.7 out of 10 people wouldn't know anything about THE THIN MAN or its two stars. The closest you might get to recognition are the names RICK and ISLA, but even then the numbers don't improve greatly and that's for a well-known movie with two well-know stars.

But back to the story.

Nora is lost in Manhattan. She has no lover, no husband, and doesn't know what she wants. She's searching for something but can't find it. You and I can both relate. It's universal.

She has several dates, but they're disasters.

It doesn't help that her best friend just celebrated her fifth wedding anniversary in what is a "perfect" marriage. It doesn't help that her mother is needling her about being single and not being set up with some man.

By chance she meets a Frenchman at a house party. She's so burnt out with life she's not interested, but he won't give up and thus begins Act II and a weekend of romance and when it's over he returns to Paris.

Not surprisingly, in circumstances I don't understand (this film likes coincidences and a lack of logic and that's okay when we're dealing with romance, but to a point), Nora and her best friend Audrey end up in Paris. They just happen to be there and decide to find Julien, Nora happens to lose her contact information for him which makes contacting him impossible and just as the movie is ending, he just happens to get on the same subway car she's riding to get to the airport.

I don't understand the third act. I don't understand the abrupt ending. There are many more ways it could have gone and this seems to be least desirable.

In a way I think I expected more from this film, but yet, until the third act, the film represents a truer picture about life and romance. This film is not the first one to get it right early and blow up in the third act--the toughest one to get right.

Posted 2009/04/15 at 17h37ET in Movie Commentary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Day 5: Writing a Novel—The Deep Blue Hold

Monday, November 21st, 2016 No work on the novel on Day 4. Note: Unedited writings from my notebook for this novel. Square bracket items represent added comments.
At 18:31—Office ... if I use Leänne instead of Leanne how will people react... Y esterday was Sunday and I took it off, plus I was dealing with some mental health issues. I know this story is something that is simply a matter of putting in the time to make it happen. I’m supposed to be working on it as much as I can but I haven’t been doing that. Two main reasons. It’s been a while since I’ve worked on a story. Then there’s the issues of my mental health. Things happen. I get down and it impacts on my writing. I might be using it as an excuse, but it’s clearly something I need to deal with. I have to find a schedule I can work with. Perhaps I need to put this first and cut out other things. Not sure but I will figure it out. A name for the hero came to me. For the moment going with Leanne or is it Leanna? Should be Le…

Writing a Novel: The Deep Blue Hold–Introduction

Thursday, March 9th, 2017 ... I fight my insecurities and doubts and I withdraw farther away from people and life ... I n November 2016 I started work on a new novel with the working title: The Deep Blue Cage. A few weeks after I started, I stopped. I was feeling too depressed about everything including the idea of writing a new novel. It happens to me at various times, with varying degrees, and it is debilitating. The ultimate issue was: Why bother? Why bother write another novel no one will read and no one will care about. I also found I was dreading the writing process more and more. It was painful to think about. I walked away and focused on other things. Or tried to. That didn’t work either. I felt trapped and unsure where I should head, what I should do. I even asked the big question, what the hell is life about anyway. There’s no one answer to this question despite the proclamations of some and because I believe I can think critically, can reason, I look at it from many a…

Day 6: Writing a Novel—The Deep Blue Hold

Tuesday, November 22nd, 2016 Note: Unedited writings from my notebook for this novel. Square bracket items represent added comments.
At 20:44—Office ... Lost at sea, she's rescued by a ship and wished she had never set foot on it.... N othing new on this story. Nothing came to me while I was sleeping or when on my errands. I thought something would come about, but nope. So be it. I have two chapters written. Not sure if they are any good but they are there. And so Chp. 3 to write. And I don’t see the scene because I’m not sure what should happen. The question is what is the cliffhanger. Nope. 3 about her, not the ship and crew. And I’ve already written the last line of the chapter. She wakes up and feels immense pain. Not sure if I should mention blood in the water. This chapter or the following. So it’s early dawn or not quite sunrise. And she’s in the cockpit unconscious. But how do I write it from her POV if she’s out. Hmmm. I can do it but should I do it? And I don’t w…