Skip to main content

The Sign of the Cross (1932)

Thursday, April 9, 2009

The Sign of the Cross. Feature film. (1932, 125 mins) IMDB

...just in time for Easter...

T

HE SIGN OF THE CROSS is probably an appropriate movie to watch around Easter although I'm sure there are many more that would be appropriate--not that I believe any of it.

The film takes place in Rome around 64 CE. Nero is Emperor (Laughton). Hedonistic. Indifferent to his people. Selfish. A non-Christian. When a massive fire rips through Rome, his thoughts turn to PR--how to get the people to believe the Christians were responsible. If he can do that, the Christians will be targeted for ridicule and death.

As the story unfolds, civilians and Roman soldiers round up Christians. They are killed for their beliefs. To avoid being captured, Christianity is a secret society based on the sign of the cross--hence the title.

If the film were simply about oppression and persecution, it would be tiresome, but the film isn't about Rome and Christians, it's a love story set in this milieu.

Mercia is a lovely, young Christian living with her father and younger brother. Marcus is a high-ranking Roman official. One day while Mercia is a filling a jug with water, he spots her and falls in love. Since one of his jobs is to round up Christians to be fed to lions, she's naturally reluctant to be involved with him.

In an Act I scene to show he has a heart, he turns a blind eye to an obvious lead to finding Christians (her brother returning to a baker to get a loaf of bread). He lets his emotions get in the way of doing his duty.

His rival, Tigellinus, uses this against him and soon Marcus is at odds with Nero. Marcus is sentenced to prison and the Christians in question, including Mercia, are captured. Marcus would die save for the Empress who is love with him. She convinces Nero to be lenient.

Claudette Colbert plays the Empress. It's a small role for such a big star, but I suppose she wasn't as big a star when this film was made.

We are introduced to her when she has a bath. No ordinary bath. Instead of water, servants fill it with donkey's milk. While there are bubbles floating on top, it's not a snow storm of bubbles (so common in films when a woman bathes) and her breasts are clearly visible. I was surprised by it, but apparently the Hays Code wasn't in effect. When the film was re-released and shown on TV many scenes were cut because they were considered objectionable. I don't know how you can object to Colbert's breast. They seem lovely to me.

Act III takes place in the arena. Romans including Nero have come for a day of fighting and killing. First the gladiators enter, shout, "We who are about to die salute thee." They battle to the death and we see the famous thumbs up or down (a movie creation apparently).

From there, animals enter to find people tied down. There are elephants, crocodile (although they used alligators which is an anachronism), bears, tigers, bulls and of course lions--lots of lions. There isn't much in the way of gory details, but a couple of the women wear nothing more than a thin, see-through scarf wrapped around their chest and waist--something Hays I'm sure would object to.

The last to enter the arena are Christians. The film moves to the dungeon where they are kept. They pray and sing and find solace in their belief that death isn't the end. They will find a new, better life in heaven. Okay.

It's in these closing scenes where Marcus comes to Merica. He has made an arrangement with Nero. If Merica renounces her faith, she'll be spared death in the arena. She refuses to give in. Then in a sign off true love, Marcus understands the afterlife. If they can't live together in this world, then they can do so in heaven. He takes her hand to enter the arena with her.

We never see the Christians dying in the arena. The film stays down in the dungeon until the end when the couple walks out.

The dungeon, with its massive steps, leading up to the arena, was designed to give the impression these people weren't just walking up from the dungeon of hell on earth to the arena, but we're walking up into heaven.

I imagine if you're a Christian, you'll enjoy this movie and all it represents.

Posted 2009/04/09 at 19h02ET in Movie Commentary.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Only We Could Agree

Monday, June 11, 2012 ... have you been accused of misspelling a word you know is correct ... S usanne O’Leary wrote an interesting article on her experience with the variations of the English language in different countries. You know the obvious ones like colour with or without a “u” but less obvious ones like travelled versus traveled. Growing up in Sweden she learnt English in school—the UK variation. In publishing her books, she read reviews where she was criticized for improper spelling. False accusations as it turns out. While I write tire and cozy, it’s not incorrect to write tyre or cosy. Same language. Both accepted. Just different. You can read her write-up here along with the numerous comments posted by readers. I found it interesting, but that’s me. As a Canadian I deal with this issue everyday. I feel her pain when she’s criticized for something based on ignorance. No fun. I was told by a boss that “data are” isn’t correct. It should be “data is.” Read...
2 comments
Read more

Day 109: Writing a Novel—The Deep Blue Hold

Sunday, March 6, 2017 Note: Unedited writings from my notebook for this novel. Square bracket items represent added comments. At 18:47 Office ... I barely remembered anything about this story ... H as it really been three months? I guess it has. I put it out of my mind [so much so] that I barely remembered anything about this story. Not even the title. [Unreal!!!!!!] I had the general premise and an ending—enough I thought for a novel. What I lacked was a determination and desire to want to write it. Why bother… I wasn’t enjoying the process and I had no reason to believe the result wouldn’t be anything more than what’s gone before—nothing. James Piper Kitchener, Ontario Post comments on facebook page. Follow me on twitter. Posted 2017/04/14 at 14h02ET in The Deep Blue Cage | Writing A Novel
Post a Comment
Read more

CRA & E-Filing

Tuesday, March 6, 2007 ... Online Tax Services Suspended by CRA ... I received an email press release from the Canada Revenue Agency late on Tuesday stating they were shutting down the computer that processed e-filed personal tax returns. For many tax preparers the announcement means they will have to file paper returns or wait for the system to come back on, but it could be a long wait. Until we can announce a business recovery date, the Agency will provide daily updates to the media on the steps we are taking. On the surface, e-filing a return makes sense because it is more efficient, but at present it only makes sense for simple returns. If you file a return beyond a T4 and an RRSP deduction, you can expect follow-up letters requesting original receipts. For accountants, this hassle means additional time—time that usually can't be recovered. As result, many accountants file paper returns for their benefit. What is required is a system that allows the recei...
Post a Comment
Read more