Skip to main content

Tough Guys Don't Dance (2008)

Tough Guys Don't Dance. Feature film. (1987, 110 mins) IMDB

...or make great movies...

D

uring its production and release, this film was well known for these simple facts: it was based on Norman Mailer's best-selling novel, he wrote the screenplay and directed the film. Since that time, the film has faded away from public consciousness for a very good reason. It's not a great film. It's not even a good film.

In describing the film, Mailer continually refers to it as a horror film. I wouldn't use that word. I would prefer the word suspense in the Hitchcock mould, however, his worst film would be more enjoyable than this film.

Ryan O'Neal plays a lost man married to a wealthy southern belle. They have a large house in Cape Town. Money isn't a problem. But it takes a while to know this because of the way the film is structured. The events that make up the plot are straightforward, but how they are told to create a convoluted situation because the film wants to show us the story from Ryan's POV and so we only know what he knows and he doesn't know much.

The film starts with Ryan waking up in this house. He appears to be confused and alone. When he goes downstairs he discovers his estranged father in the dinning room. As they talk, we discover what has happened and the film flashes back to different points until we return to that morning when he wakes up again and the film proceeds from there to end the story.

There are six major players in this film. Ryan as the befuddled husband. His beautiful, wealthy wife. Her former husband, another southerner with loads more money and college friend to Ryan. There is the chief of police who behaves more like a criminal than an officer of the law. A couple from California who appears out of nowhere. Plus a couple of local deadbeat thugs. That's eight, but you can think of them as six. Then I almost forgot Isablla Rosselini. She's married to the police chief, but in love with Ryan.

Throw in a quantity of cocaine worth a few millions and people with a lot of greed and you have your story.

The rich southerner produces an attaché filled with $2 million in cash. In films, it's always an attaché filled with cash even if $2 million would require a chest trunk to hold. His money will buy the coke and as part of the deal to net $10 million in return. It's never explained who will buy it on the end. Nor do we see the stash of coke, probably because it doesn't exist. So there's our first greedy person. Because the deal collapses and he sees himself as a failure, he kills himself with a pistol in the end and besides, greedy people have to die off in these types of stories.

His former wife and Ryan's current wife is also greedy. She apparently leaves Ryan at the start of the film. She's after money as well. A complete gold digger. She dies when her lust for the money gets in the way of the chief of police. He kills her and cuts off her head. The head baffles and terrifies Ryan when he finds it. The implication is he killed her. He's going to jail, but that sense of angst over a wrongfully convicted man doesn't develop because he doesn't know if he did or didn't kill her. Too much booze and drugs to remember. Because he doesn't know, we don't know.

At one point the California couple have control of the money. The husband is going to vanish with it and leave her behind. She kills him. Then the police chief kills her to get the money, but his greed results in his death as well.

Lots and lots of dead bodies.

Bodies that Ryan and his father dump into the ocean.

The film is in short a muddled mess. In some respects a different cutting might have made for a better film, but even then the subject matter isn't that interesting and a few scenes are simply repulsive.

Posted 2009/04/08 at 21h39ET in Movie Commentary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Please, Please, Please, No More

Saturday, October 8, 2011 ... what is the best way to start your novel ... C ount them. One. Two. I downloaded two thriller e-books from amazon.com, both published by the author, and they both started the same way: the character waking up and going about some morning ritual. Both books were in the top 100 bestsellers of Mystery & Thrillers Fiction. Both had many positive reviews. Those facts seemed encouraging, but once I read the opening scene, I stopped. I did not continue. But James that seems harsh? Perhaps, yes, but the writer is sending a signal with such an opening. It says, I have more to learn about writing thrillers for today’s audience. Why do I say that? Because a waking-up scene is mundane. It’s ordinary. It happens to us everyday. We don’t read thrillers for the mundane and ordinary. We read them for the extraordinary. We read them to live vicariously through the characters. We read them to be entertained. There is nothing in those waking-up scenes th...

Analysis of Amazon E-book Fiction Bestsellers (Week #1)

Sunday, October 30, 2011 ... trying to make sense of the amazon bestsellers and pricing for e-books ... E ach hour Amazon updates its bestsellers lists. I have taken a daily snapshot of the top 20 bestsellers in the e-book fiction list for the past week. See here . What can be learnt from these data? 1. 4 out 5 of the bestsellers are from print or traditional authors. Most are brand-named authors who dominate the print bestsellers. 2. Almost all of the authors have multiple titles to their credit. The author of The Help is a notable exception. 3. The e-book prices of indie authors are substantially lower than print authors. For the most part, their titles are priced at $0.99. 4. The books on the list fall into four categories: (i) pre-release from brand-named authors, (ii) new or recently released titles (iii) long-term bestsellers (greater than one year), (iv) backlist titles. Indie authors fall into (ii) and (iv). 5. The indie authors includes authors who ...

Checked Off

Sunday, April 11, 2010 ... one To Do is off the list ... I recently completed a task that was completely irrational. It was a fixture on my To-Do list because I always put it off. This week I decided to change that. I dug through my files of sketches and drawings and scanned them into my computer. A simple concept, sure, but tedious and time consuming. I suggest wearing latex gloves or buying hand lotion, but maybe that's a personal choice...Anyway, I now have a folder with 1.2 GBs of JPEG and PSD files. Here's an example from 1992. Right, where's that To-Do list? I want to sketch a line on it. Posted 2010/04/11 at 13h54ET in JamesPiper.com.