Skip to main content

Deception (1946)

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Deception. Feature film. (1946, 110 mins) IMDB

...Why was Bette Davis such a big star?...

W

hat is the deception in DECEPTION? It doesn't take long to figure out even though it's never explicitly stated. This is a film made in 1946. The Hollywood system still existed and so did the production code, but another code existed--the code of subtext to tell you A when you can't say A.

The film takes place in NYC. WWII is over, thankfully, and Karel is playing his cello in front of a small audience in a concert hall. In the back wings is Bette Davis, tears in her eyes, as she listens to the performance. Backstage we understand why. They were lovers during the war. She escaped from Europe to live in the US. He was left behind and she thought he had died. Two lovers reunite, plan to marry and do. It happens all so fast, but Davis has a history while living these past four years in the US and it forms part of her deception.

She's supposedly a poor, struggling piano player, but lives in a tony apartment with lots of furs, clothes and art. There is a certain dissonance between what she tells Karel and what he sees.

Enter Claude Rains as Alex Hollenius. He plays a wealthy and famous composer of classical music and, what is told but never said, the lover of Davis. She has been his kept lover. We see a side of Rains that is mercurial compared to his charming role in CASABLANCA or his diplomatic role in LAWARENCE OF ARABIA. He is one of my favourite actors.

With this setup, Act I is over and we spend the rest of the movie dealing with the tension between the three of them. Davis wants to hide her past. Alex wants her back and when he can't, wants revenge. Karel is a struggling artist trying to make something of himself. He falls into Alex's hands when Alex composes a cello concerto for him to play.

There are rehearsal and threats. Toying and more threats. It's tearing everyone apart. When will the truth be finally in the open? That's the question, but it doesn't happen. Davis murders Alex and makes it look like a suicide. Somehow she gets away with it, or at least, the film ends before we ever find out.

To date, I've watched several Bette Davis movies and the only one I find the least bit interesting is ALL ABOUT EVE. Maybe if I were a woman, I'd feel differently. Or perhaps, if I were watching her movies when they were released, I feel differently. I'm not sure what it is.

I've seen numerous Cary Grant movies of the same time period (e.g., HIS GAL FRIDAY, NOTORIOUS, THE PHILADELPHIA STORY) and love the movies. They are great movies. Movies I'd want to watch again. But I can't say the same about these Davis movies even though I know she was a big star in her day. One of the giants of all time if I want to believe the AFI listing of top stars.

Posted 2009/02/01 at 17h32ET in Movie Commentary.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Only We Could Agree

Monday, June 11, 2012 ... have you been accused of misspelling a word you know is correct ... S usanne O’Leary wrote an interesting article on her experience with the variations of the English language in different countries. You know the obvious ones like colour with or without a “u” but less obvious ones like travelled versus traveled. Growing up in Sweden she learnt English in school—the UK variation. In publishing her books, she read reviews where she was criticized for improper spelling. False accusations as it turns out. While I write tire and cozy, it’s not incorrect to write tyre or cosy. Same language. Both accepted. Just different. You can read her write-up here along with the numerous comments posted by readers. I found it interesting, but that’s me. As a Canadian I deal with this issue everyday. I feel her pain when she’s criticized for something based on ignorance. No fun. I was told by a boss that “data are” isn’t correct. It should be “data is.” Read...
2 comments
Read more

Day 109: Writing a Novel—The Deep Blue Hold

Sunday, March 6, 2017 Note: Unedited writings from my notebook for this novel. Square bracket items represent added comments. At 18:47 Office ... I barely remembered anything about this story ... H as it really been three months? I guess it has. I put it out of my mind [so much so] that I barely remembered anything about this story. Not even the title. [Unreal!!!!!!] I had the general premise and an ending—enough I thought for a novel. What I lacked was a determination and desire to want to write it. Why bother… I wasn’t enjoying the process and I had no reason to believe the result wouldn’t be anything more than what’s gone before—nothing. James Piper Kitchener, Ontario Post comments on facebook page. Follow me on twitter. Posted 2017/04/14 at 14h02ET in The Deep Blue Cage | Writing A Novel
Post a Comment
Read more

CRA & E-Filing

Tuesday, March 6, 2007 ... Online Tax Services Suspended by CRA ... I received an email press release from the Canada Revenue Agency late on Tuesday stating they were shutting down the computer that processed e-filed personal tax returns. For many tax preparers the announcement means they will have to file paper returns or wait for the system to come back on, but it could be a long wait. Until we can announce a business recovery date, the Agency will provide daily updates to the media on the steps we are taking. On the surface, e-filing a return makes sense because it is more efficient, but at present it only makes sense for simple returns. If you file a return beyond a T4 and an RRSP deduction, you can expect follow-up letters requesting original receipts. For accountants, this hassle means additional time—time that usually can't be recovered. As result, many accountants file paper returns for their benefit. What is required is a system that allows the recei...
Post a Comment
Read more