Skip to main content

The Prisoner of Zenda (1937)

Sunday, March 1, 2009

The Prisoner of Zenda. Feature film. (1937, 101 mins) IMDB

...A charming, interesting, well-made film....

R

onald Colman plays an Englishman who has come to a fictional European country (think Germany or Austria of 100 years ago) to enjoy some time fishing. He's immediately mistaken for the crown prince who looks exactly like him because he plays both roles.

Madelaine Carroll is a princess. While she has a small role in the film, each moment she's on screen is a pleasure because he was beautiful and captivating.

C. Audry Smith plays a grandfatherly-senior advisor to the king. David Niven, in a small role, plays the junior advisor.

Raymond Massey, in an amazing performance, plays the king's older brother. He is a villain to the core. He believes he should be king and not his brother, but they won't let him be king because they had different mothers.

Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. plays an aristocrat aligned with the brother, but plays the role with whim and humour. Quite a contrast.

As for the story. Our hero, the commoner, arrives in the fictional country to go fishing. Immediately people stop and stare because as we learn he looks identical to the crown prince whose coronation is tomorrow.

After his arrival and out in the wilderness, he happens to meet the crown prince and his two advisors. They hit it off because of their identical look and learn they share common ancestors. They are cousins.

Invited back to the lodge, the king-to-be and company drink and eat and toast. Seems the king drinks a bit too much, and, well, the evil brother has spiked his wine with something and he passes out.

Morning comes and the state of affairs is in ruins. The king is not conscious and can't attend his coronation. His brother has drafted documents to take over as reagent. If a king isn't crowned, he'll never be crowned and Michael will win.

Enter the inciting incident. The advisors convince our hero to be the king for the purposes of the coronation. Just one day. He reluctantly agrees. The king is crowned and Michael's plan is foiled until he hatches a new one.

The brother orders the Fairbanks character to kidnap the real king. As a result our hero gets to play king for longer than he bargained. Enter the princess.

I should note, everyone who meets him doesn't suspect a thing.

Our hero and our love interest hit it off and the love story of this film has started. Lots of scenes in Act II are between them, yet, the princess doesn't have a great deal of screen time.

The game of identities can't continue. Our hero wants the princess and will stay on as king to keep her. The brother wants to take over and get rid of the king. The advisors want the true king to be in place. The Fairbanks character wants to gain some wealth and power from the happenings. Something has to give.

The intrigue that develops is quite convoluted and dynamic but ultimately leads to a showdown where our hero goes to the castle to rescue the king and does.

The brother is murdered. The Fairbanks character stabs him with a knife. Guards are killed. Then the big fight. Our hero and Fairbanks in a sword fight. Effective and entertaining until our hero gains the upper hand. Fairbanks jumps out of the window to fight another day. Our hero cuts the rope to allow the draw bridge down and reinforcements to enter. The king is saved and is able to rule as if nothing happened.

The film ends with our hero meeting with the princess. They are madly in love, but she must put that aside for the good of her country. No happy ever after.

The Prisoner of Zenda (1937) is an enjoyable film with lively characters. The quality of it all stands up some seventy plus years after it was made.

Posted 2009/03/01 at 17h57ET in Movie Commentary.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CRA & E-Filing

Tuesday, March 6, 2007 ... Online Tax Services Suspended by CRA ... I received an email press release from the Canada Revenue Agency late on Tuesday stating they were shutting down the computer that processed e-filed personal tax returns. For many tax preparers the announcement means they will have to file paper returns or wait for the system to come back on, but it could be a long wait. Until we can announce a business recovery date, the Agency will provide daily updates to the media on the steps we are taking. On the surface, e-filing a return makes sense because it is more efficient, but at present it only makes sense for simple returns. If you file a return beyond a T4 and an RRSP deduction, you can expect follow-up letters requesting original receipts. For accountants, this hassle means additional time—time that usually can't be recovered. As result, many accountants file paper returns for their benefit. What is required is a system that allows the recei...
Post a Comment
Read more

If Only We Could Agree

Monday, June 11, 2012 ... have you been accused of misspelling a word you know is correct ... S usanne O’Leary wrote an interesting article on her experience with the variations of the English language in different countries. You know the obvious ones like colour with or without a “u” but less obvious ones like travelled versus traveled. Growing up in Sweden she learnt English in school—the UK variation. In publishing her books, she read reviews where she was criticized for improper spelling. False accusations as it turns out. While I write tire and cozy, it’s not incorrect to write tyre or cosy. Same language. Both accepted. Just different. You can read her write-up here along with the numerous comments posted by readers. I found it interesting, but that’s me. As a Canadian I deal with this issue everyday. I feel her pain when she’s criticized for something based on ignorance. No fun. I was told by a boss that “data are” isn’t correct. It should be “data is.” Read...
2 comments
Read more

The Crusades (1935)

Sunday, March 29, 2009 The Crusades. Feature film. (1935, 125 mins) IMDB ... a Hollywood romance with swords thrown in ... T he title is extremely misleading. The film is not about the crusades but a love story set in the midst of a crusade led by King Richard. Richard never spoke English and barely even lived on the British isles. He was a Norman who spoke French, but you wouldn't know that from this film. The filmmakers also want you to believe the King would have been caught up in something as trivial as love. Not a chance. Marriage wasn't about love. It was about matters of state, about power, and with that power, wealth. A true-to-history film about King Richard and the Crusades would lack romance and therefore wouldn't appeal to a broad audience. What we have in this film is nothing more than a love story. Richard is betrothed to Alice, the sister of King Philip of France. He doesn't want to marry her. He decides to go on the crusad...
Post a Comment
Read more