Skip to main content

They Just Don't Get It

Saturday, March 21, 2009

...open mouth, insert second foot...

1

50 year after the publication of ON THE ORGIN OF SPECIES, the most researched and defined theory in science still generates controversy and denial. This week it was Gary Goodyear, the Conservative MP for the riding of Cambridge.

Anne McIlroy of the Globe and Mail asked him if he believed in evolution. This was his response:

I'm not going to answer that question. I am a Christian, and I don't think anybody asking a question about my religion is appropriate.

In other words he's a bible-thumper in denial about evolution. It wouldn't matter except he's the federal Minister of State for Science and Technology.

He adds to his errors when he says:

I do believe that just because you can't see it under a microscope doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It could mean we don't have a powerful enough microscope yet.

I guess he's not familiar with Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and the photo electric effect. It's impossible, for instance, to look at an electron with an optical microscope. The electron moves when hit with light energy. Not to mention the fact the light wave is much bigger than an electron and misses it in most instances. So much for a powerful enough microscope.

When the first article appeared on Tuesday, it created a dust cloud. The minister then tried to clarify (see G&M article) or backtrack or, I'm not sure what to call it, except another goof, when he said this:

We are evolving every year, every decade. That's a fact, whether it is to the intensity of the sun, whether it is to, as a chiropractor, walking on cement versus anything else, whether it is running shoes or high heels, of course we are evolving to our environment.

He can't even get the concept of evolution correct. We don't evolve in response to a changing environment. We simply evolve as a matter of living and if those changes suit the environment and the individual lives to reproduce, those new traits get carried on through future generations.

In the United States under George W. Bush, the US administration implemented policies based on religious beliefs that reminded me and others of the dark ages--that vast period of history where an autocratic church controlled people's lives like Stalin.

The theory of evolution as first beautifully and intelligently put forward by Charles Darwin is a fact. Life evolves and it has for hundreds of millions of years. Get used to it. It's not going away.

Posted 2009/03/21 at 08h06ET in Theory of Evolution.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CRA & E-Filing

Tuesday, March 6, 2007 ... Online Tax Services Suspended by CRA ... I received an email press release from the Canada Revenue Agency late on Tuesday stating they were shutting down the computer that processed e-filed personal tax returns. For many tax preparers the announcement means they will have to file paper returns or wait for the system to come back on, but it could be a long wait. Until we can announce a business recovery date, the Agency will provide daily updates to the media on the steps we are taking. On the surface, e-filing a return makes sense because it is more efficient, but at present it only makes sense for simple returns. If you file a return beyond a T4 and an RRSP deduction, you can expect follow-up letters requesting original receipts. For accountants, this hassle means additional time—time that usually can't be recovered. As result, many accountants file paper returns for their benefit. What is required is a system that allows the recei...
Post a Comment
Read more

If Only We Could Agree

Monday, June 11, 2012 ... have you been accused of misspelling a word you know is correct ... S usanne O’Leary wrote an interesting article on her experience with the variations of the English language in different countries. You know the obvious ones like colour with or without a “u” but less obvious ones like travelled versus traveled. Growing up in Sweden she learnt English in school—the UK variation. In publishing her books, she read reviews where she was criticized for improper spelling. False accusations as it turns out. While I write tire and cozy, it’s not incorrect to write tyre or cosy. Same language. Both accepted. Just different. You can read her write-up here along with the numerous comments posted by readers. I found it interesting, but that’s me. As a Canadian I deal with this issue everyday. I feel her pain when she’s criticized for something based on ignorance. No fun. I was told by a boss that “data are” isn’t correct. It should be “data is.” Read...
2 comments
Read more

The Crusades (1935)

Sunday, March 29, 2009 The Crusades. Feature film. (1935, 125 mins) IMDB ... a Hollywood romance with swords thrown in ... T he title is extremely misleading. The film is not about the crusades but a love story set in the midst of a crusade led by King Richard. Richard never spoke English and barely even lived on the British isles. He was a Norman who spoke French, but you wouldn't know that from this film. The filmmakers also want you to believe the King would have been caught up in something as trivial as love. Not a chance. Marriage wasn't about love. It was about matters of state, about power, and with that power, wealth. A true-to-history film about King Richard and the Crusades would lack romance and therefore wouldn't appeal to a broad audience. What we have in this film is nothing more than a love story. Richard is betrothed to Alice, the sister of King Philip of France. He doesn't want to marry her. He decides to go on the crusad...
Post a Comment
Read more