Skip to main content

Tucker: The Man and His Dream (1988)

Tucker: The Man and His Dream. Feature film. (1988, 115mins) IMDB

...The American Dream lives on in film...

I

f you told me there was man named Preston Tucker and in the 1940s he designed and built a better car, I wouldn't have believed you. Not in the period during and after WWII. But this film is built on real events and was a passion of the director since he's from Detroit.

Tucker had a passion for cars. He's a dreamer, an optimist. Nothing gets him down and in this film there are lots of reasons for getting him down.

The film has a straightforward structure. Introduce our hero and his family. He has an idea for a wonderful new car, but doesn't know where to go from there. He gets an idea for publicity. His car is featured in magazines and thousands of people are writing to him. They want the car. Since he's broke, he has to raise financing on Wall St. That means a money man in the form of Abe played by Martin Landau.

Act II is about building prototype or proof of concept so the brokers can sell the shares. Once they have the financing, they then have to find a factory and the materials to make the car. They also need an experienced auto executive to run the business and in the process management waters down the car.

There is also a dark force in the form of a Senator from Michigan played by Lloyd Bridges. The Big Three and the Senator want Tucker to fail.

As Act II ends, the pieces for Tucker are falling into place. The assembly line is producing cars, even if at a slow rate. Then disaster. The government brings fraud charges down on him. He stole money. His car isn't wasn't what he advertised. It's an injustice, but it brings a resolution of the story. There are court proceedings where it's clear the government in interfering with justice. They can't let Tucker succeed.

Meanwhile back at the factory his loyal employees are frantically working around the clock to produce fifty of his car and satisfy the terms of a contract he has with the government for lease of a factory complex.

The cars are made. Tucker makes an impassioned and trite speech about the "American Dream." The jury gives its predictable verdict and everybody parades out on the street as the 50 cars arrive from the factory.

The story didn't move me or interest me much. I can say I don't care about cars. I just don't get the fascination with a piece of metal.

There are some interesting trick shots in the film. In one, Tucker sits at the kitchen table at home as they discuss getting a factory. When he gets up from the table, he steps forward, flips his hat on and in the next step we're inside the factory.

The beginning uses a tongue-in-cheek, propaganda-feeling narration and industrial file. I think it sets the wrong tone for the film. It says it wants to be a satire and comedy, yet the film is a drama with dark undertones.

It was publicity that brought Tucker fame and his chance at a dream, and it brought him down, but surely it was folly to believe he could create a car company to rival Detroit.

Posted 2009/03/09 at 19h49ET in Movie Commentary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Only We Could Agree

Monday, June 11, 2012 ... have you been accused of misspelling a word you know is correct ... S usanne O’Leary wrote an interesting article on her experience with the variations of the English language in different countries. You know the obvious ones like colour with or without a “u” but less obvious ones like travelled versus traveled. Growing up in Sweden she learnt English in school—the UK variation. In publishing her books, she read reviews where she was criticized for improper spelling. False accusations as it turns out. While I write tire and cozy, it’s not incorrect to write tyre or cosy. Same language. Both accepted. Just different. You can read her write-up here along with the numerous comments posted by readers. I found it interesting, but that’s me. As a Canadian I deal with this issue everyday. I feel her pain when she’s criticized for something based on ignorance. No fun. I was told by a boss that “data are” isn’t correct. It should be “data is.” Read...

Day 109: Writing a Novel—The Deep Blue Hold

Sunday, March 6, 2017 Note: Unedited writings from my notebook for this novel. Square bracket items represent added comments. At 18:47 Office ... I barely remembered anything about this story ... H as it really been three months? I guess it has. I put it out of my mind [so much so] that I barely remembered anything about this story. Not even the title. [Unreal!!!!!!] I had the general premise and an ending—enough I thought for a novel. What I lacked was a determination and desire to want to write it. Why bother… I wasn’t enjoying the process and I had no reason to believe the result wouldn’t be anything more than what’s gone before—nothing. James Piper Kitchener, Ontario Post comments on facebook page. Follow me on twitter. Posted 2017/04/14 at 14h02ET in The Deep Blue Cage | Writing A Novel

CRA & E-Filing

Tuesday, March 6, 2007 ... Online Tax Services Suspended by CRA ... I received an email press release from the Canada Revenue Agency late on Tuesday stating they were shutting down the computer that processed e-filed personal tax returns. For many tax preparers the announcement means they will have to file paper returns or wait for the system to come back on, but it could be a long wait. Until we can announce a business recovery date, the Agency will provide daily updates to the media on the steps we are taking. On the surface, e-filing a return makes sense because it is more efficient, but at present it only makes sense for simple returns. If you file a return beyond a T4 and an RRSP deduction, you can expect follow-up letters requesting original receipts. For accountants, this hassle means additional time—time that usually can't be recovered. As result, many accountants file paper returns for their benefit. What is required is a system that allows the recei...