Skip to main content

The Prisoner of Zenda (1952)

Sunday, March 1, 2009

The Prisoner of Zenda. Feature film. (1952, 95 mins) IMDB

...A fascinating study in remaking a classic film....

T

he film is a remake of a 1937 film of the same name. A study of the two films is an interesting lesson in filmmaking.

The original film is based on a novel. I can't say anything about the adaptation. The second film is basically the same script but with different directors and actors. There are few changes between the first and second film. The dialogue is virtually identical. The scenes and even the direction is the same, but they aren't the same film. How is that possible? Three characters.

David Niven plays a small role as a junior advisor to the king in the first film and he stands out because he's David Niven. The same role exists in the second film with an actor I don't recognize and well, he seemed invisible.

Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. played Hentzau probably the only way he could with flamboyance, a laugh and over the top, but it was fun to watch. James Mason is an entirely different person and the performance is more menacing and devoid of humour. Both effective but I preferred Fairbanks even though I have nothing against Mason and have enjoyed his other performances.

Then there is the brother to the king who wants to be king. The minute Raymond Massey shows up on screen we feel the evil of the character and it continues until his final scene in the movie. The actor in this role in the second movie seemed invisible and at best a warm towel.

For the casting choices and acting alone, I argue the first version is a much better film, but not entirely. The sword fight at the end between Mason and Granger is one of the best in film. At least pre-CGI films. It's much better than what happened in the first film, but it's not enough to compensate for the other deficiencies.

In William Goldman's book WHAT LIE DID I TELL? he states that you have a chance if you have: a good script, the right director and it's cast properly. If those ingredients aren't in place at the start of production, then the film will surely fail. Having watched these films back to back, I can see what he means. Same script, same directing but different casting and they aren't the same films.

The rest of the casting works. Granger for Coleman. Kerr for Carroll. Louis Calhern for G. Audrey Smith. They all worked.

Mary Astor is believable in the first film and Jane Greer in the second, but each different. To me, Greer catches and hold your eye. She has an intriguing look with a sense of power and command within. Astor is more plain looking and vulnerable. The sense of desperation of the character is entirely believable. Greer works in this small role, but she deserved staring roles.

Posted 2009/03/01 at 17h57ET in Movie Commentary.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Please, Please, Please, No More

Saturday, October 8, 2011 ... what is the best way to start your novel ... C ount them. One. Two. I downloaded two thriller e-books from amazon.com, both published by the author, and they both started the same way: the character waking up and going about some morning ritual. Both books were in the top 100 bestsellers of Mystery & Thrillers Fiction. Both had many positive reviews. Those facts seemed encouraging, but once I read the opening scene, I stopped. I did not continue. But James that seems harsh? Perhaps, yes, but the writer is sending a signal with such an opening. It says, I have more to learn about writing thrillers for today’s audience. Why do I say that? Because a waking-up scene is mundane. It’s ordinary. It happens to us everyday. We don’t read thrillers for the mundane and ordinary. We read them for the extraordinary. We read them to live vicariously through the characters. We read them to be entertained. There is nothing in those waking-up scenes th...
2 comments
Read more

Analysis of Amazon E-book Fiction Bestsellers (Week #1)

Sunday, October 30, 2011 ... trying to make sense of the amazon bestsellers and pricing for e-books ... E ach hour Amazon updates its bestsellers lists. I have taken a daily snapshot of the top 20 bestsellers in the e-book fiction list for the past week. See here . What can be learnt from these data? 1. 4 out 5 of the bestsellers are from print or traditional authors. Most are brand-named authors who dominate the print bestsellers. 2. Almost all of the authors have multiple titles to their credit. The author of The Help is a notable exception. 3. The e-book prices of indie authors are substantially lower than print authors. For the most part, their titles are priced at $0.99. 4. The books on the list fall into four categories: (i) pre-release from brand-named authors, (ii) new or recently released titles (iii) long-term bestsellers (greater than one year), (iv) backlist titles. Indie authors fall into (ii) and (iv). 5. The indie authors includes authors who ...
2 comments
Read more

Checked Off

Sunday, April 11, 2010 ... one To Do is off the list ... I recently completed a task that was completely irrational. It was a fixture on my To-Do list because I always put it off. This week I decided to change that. I dug through my files of sketches and drawings and scanned them into my computer. A simple concept, sure, but tedious and time consuming. I suggest wearing latex gloves or buying hand lotion, but maybe that's a personal choice...Anyway, I now have a folder with 1.2 GBs of JPEG and PSD files. Here's an example from 1992. Right, where's that To-Do list? I want to sketch a line on it. Posted 2010/04/11 at 13h54ET in JamesPiper.com.
Post a Comment
Read more